Prologue
The Mnemonic Information Management System (MIMS) empowers users to
control how their information is prioritized and where their attention
is directed. For this reason, our customers have found that the MIMS
enables tremendous productivity gains for evolving or recurring
searches against large volumes of information.
The following scenario is intended to illustrate the capabilities of
the Mnemonic Information Management System (MIMS). All results are
obtained using the current version of our software, with a graphical
user interface that we employ for demonstration purposes.
Scenario
For the purposes of this scenario, let's say that a user is interested
in all Reuters news stories that are material to Ford Motor Company's
core automotive business. Our scenario consists of the following four
steps.
Step 1: Keyword Search
When the user searches for news using the keyword "Ford", 117 hits are
returned from a collection of only 19,043 documents. These 117 hits
include many uninteresting stories about Ford's credit and defense
subsidiaries as well as entirely irrelevant stories about automotive
suppliers, car dealers, car owners, and even former President Gerald
Ford. This screen shot shows the headlines of the first 30 hits
returned by the keyword search.
Even worse, the keyword search has missed several important news
stories about the domestic automotive market -- including critical
labor relations issues -- that are material to Ford's core automotive
business but do not contain the keyword "Ford".
Step 2: User Marks Examples
Mnemonic's software allows users to prioritize information according
to their unique requirements. Unlike a keyword search engine, our
software is ideal for evolving or recurring searches.
To use our software, the user must identify documents that are
relevant along with documents considered irrelevant.
Here the user has marked four documents as relevant (marked in blue)
and another four documents as irrelevant (marked in red). Note that
all documents are assigned an initial relevance score of 0.50 (50%)
because the user's relevance model has not yet been trained.
Step 3: System Creates Model
Next, our system create a statistical model of the user's information
need, based on the documents marked by the user. The model creation
process occurs in the background and does not interfere with the
user's work flow.
Step 4: Model Prioritizes Information
After a relevance model is created, it ranks all documents on behalf
of the user. The user may retrieve the new ranking at any time.
This screenshot shows the 30 most relevant documents in the new
ranking. The documents marked in blue have been labeled by the user,
while those in black have not yet been labeled by the user. Notice
that the top articles (ie., the articles with the highest relevance
scores) are all material to Ford's core automotive business.
This screenshot shows the 30 least relevant documents in the new
ranking. Most of these articles are clearly irrelevant to Ford's core
automotive business.
To refine the ranking produced by their relevance model, the user
simply marks more documents and asks our system to create a new model.
Our system is highly accuracy and very easy to use. It can
dramatically improve the user's productivity and the quality of their
search experience.
Epilogue
Once a relevance model is created, it is stored for future use and
can be used to automatically prioritize new information as it becomes
available. The user can also continue to refine their relevance
model over time, which will further improve its accuracy.
In the preceeding scenario, the user explicitly marked articles
according to their information needs. It is also possible to create
relevance models based solely on user behavior. For example, a
model can be created based on the documents that a user has retrieved
or purchased. The resulting model can be used to recommend documents
that the user is likely to retrieve or purchase.